Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  100 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 100 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

09:36 - 09:39

S5-5

(PP)

MODIYFING CURRENT INDICATIONS FOR IMAGING IN PEDIATRIC BLUNT RENAL

TRAUMA

Jason K AU

1

, Thomas STOUT

1

, Xishi TAN

1

, Irina STANASEL

1

, David R ROTH

1

, Edmond T GONZALES, JR.

1

, Duong TU

1

,

Abhishek SETH

1

, Chester J KOH

1

, Patricio C GARGOLLO

1

, Bindi NAIK-MATHURIA

2

and Nicolette JANZEN

1

1) Texas Children's Hospital / Baylor College of Medicine, Urology, Houston, USA - 2) Texas Children's Hospital / Baylor

College of Medicine, Surgery, Houston, USA

PURPOSE

Gross hematuria is seen in 1/3 of significant renal injuries in pediatric blunt renal trauma (PBRT). We analyze whether

eliminating gross hematuria and mechanism as imaging criteria in PBRT will affect rates of detection of high (AAST IV-V)

and low (AAST I-III) grade renal injury.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of our PBRT database 1995-2015, stratifying patients into two cohorts: high grade

and low grade injury, and analyzed PE findings (abdominal/flank tenderness or bruising), N/V, and gross

hematuria. Patients with incomplete data were excluded. Statistics were performed by Fisher’s exact test (SPSS v. 21).

RESULTS

Of 74 renal injuries, 23 were high grade (all AAST IV) and 51 were low grade (19 grade III, 13 grade II, 19 grade I).

Median age was 12.4 years (0.1-19.6). Comparing high v. low grade cohorts: 100% v. 78% patients manifested

abdominal/flank pain on PE (p= 0.0135), 56.5% v. 24% had N/V (p=0.0088), and 90% v. 78% had gross hematuria

(p=0.5250). Using the criteria 1) abdominal/flank pain or 2) N/V for scanning, one CT in the high grade cohort v. seven

in the low grade cohort would NOT have been performed (p=0.4218), however all these patients were managed non-

operatively and did not require blood transfusions. In the high grade cohort, 4 patients required double J stenting and

one patient had angioembolization, all of which would have been scanned based on the criteria above. No trauma or

delayed nephrectomies were performed in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that indications for CT imaging in PBRT should include abdominal/flank PE findings and N/V, and

exclude mechanism and gross hematuria. A larger prospective multi-center trial is warranted to verify these findings.