Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  121 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 121 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

11:40 - 11:43

S8-3

(PP)

PERCENT IMPROVEMENT IN RENAL PELVIS ANTEROPOSTERIOR DIAMETER

IMPROVEMENT (APDI): VALIDATION AND FURTHER EXPLORATION OF CUT-OFF

VALUES THAT PREDICT SUCCESS POST-PYELOPLASTY AND SAFE MONITORING

WITH ULTRASOUND ALONE

Mandy RICKARD

1

, Jennifer D'CRUZ

2

, Armando LORENZO

3

, Carline BOZZATO

1

, Rodrigo ROMAO

4

, Natasha BROWNRIGG

5

,

Jorge DEMARIA

1

and Luis BRAGA

1

1) McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery / Urology, Hamilton, CANADA - 2)

McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, Hamilton,

CANADA - 3) The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery / Urology, Toronto, CANADA - 4) Dalhousie

University, Department of Surgery / Urology, Halifax, CANADA - 5) McMaster Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery

/ Urology, Hamilton, CANADA

PURPOSE

Renogram is frequently ordered post-pyeloplasty to confirm adequate drainage in patients with residual hydronephrosis

(HN). Recent evidence suggests that percent AP diameter improvement (APDI) ≥38% is predictive of pyeloplasty

success. We sought to further explore APDI ranges that would allow identification of patients who would require follow-

up with US alone, a post-operative renal scan and those with recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (rUPJO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our prospectively collected pyeloplasty database (2008-15) was reviewed (n=135). Only patients with both pre and

post-operative APD measurements were included (n=125;93%). APDI was divided into 3 categories: 0-19%; 20-39%;

≥40%. The following variables were collected post-operatively: patients monitored with US alone, renogram and US,

rUPJO and minimal or resolved HN (APD<15mm).

RESULTS

Mean minimum follow-up was 7.3±7.3 months. Of 125 patients, 76(61%) had US alone, 49(39%) had a renogram and

US, and 6(4%) developed rUPJO. Of 76 patients who had US alone, 54 (72%; p<0.01) demonstrated ≥40%APDI. Of 49

patients with renogram and US 31(63%; p<0.01) had ≥40%APDI. Of 78 patients with post-pyeloplsty APD<15mm,

65(83%; p<0.01) had ≥40%APDI. Table 1 shows descriptives for these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Documentation of ≥40%APDI at the first post-operative visit strongly predicts pyeloplasty success, as 84% of these

patients showed minimal or resolved HN and 72% underwent non-invasive monitoring by US alone. Our data suggests

that up to 63% of renograms may have been unnecessary. Finally, ≤20%APDI permitted identification of all rUPJO

cases. Stratification of patients based on APDI is a promising strategy for minimizing radiation exposure while safely

detecting children at risk for rUPJO.

Table 1

APDI Ranges

0-19% 20-39% ≥40% p Value

US Only

n=76 (%)

11(14) 11(14) 54(72) <0.01

Renogram + US

n=49(%)

11(23) 7(14)

31(63) <0.01

Total

n=125

22

18

85

APD<15mm

n=78(%)

4(5)

9(12)

65(83) <0.01

rUPJO

n=6%

6(100) 0

0