Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  255 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 255 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

S20-9

(P)

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PEDIATRIC OPEN PYELOPLASTY, LAPAROSCOPY-

ASSISTED EXTRACORPOREAL PYELOPLASTY AND ROBOT-ASSISTED

LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY

Sang Hoon SONG

1

, Chanwoo LEE

1

, Jaeyoon JUNG

1

, Jae Shin PARK

2

and Kun Suk KIM

1

1) Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Department of Urology, Seoul, KOREA (REPUBLIC OF) -

2) Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Daegu, KOREA (REPUBLIC OF)

PURPOSE

We perform open, laparoscopy assisted extracorporeal and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty and have compared these

techniques regarding the per-operative variables and post-operative outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the age-matched cohort of 30 children who underwent open pyeloplasty (OP), 30 children

who underwent laparoscopy-assisted extracorporeal pyeloplasty (LEXP), and 10 children who underwent robot-assisted

laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) at a single institution. Successful surgery was defined as resolution of symptoms,

improvement of hydronephrosis on follow-up ultrasound, and improvement of drainage on diuretic renal scan without

history of ureteral stent re-insertion or re-do pyeloplasty.

RESULTS

The mean value of age was 120.2 months, SFU grade was 3.6, anteroposterior diameter was 3.1cm, and relative

function was 44.0%. Aberrant vessel compressing the ureteropelvic junction was identified in 10% in OP, 23.3% in

LEXP, and 50% in RALP (p=0.031). Mean length of stay was significantly shorter in RALP (3.2 days) than in OP (6.6

days) or in LEXP (5.8 days) (p<0.001). Duration of analgesics use was also shorter in RALP (1.1 days) than others

(p<0.001). Complications after surgery was noted in 4 cases of OP and LEXP group. Malfunction of the robot arm was

once reported in RALP group. During the mean follow up period of 49.0, 20.1, and 6 months, success rate was 96.7%,

89.7%, and 100%, which was not statistically different in OP, LEXP, and RALP group, respectively (p=0.499). In

multivariate regression analysis, presence of aberrant vessel was the only factor that deteriorates successful outcome

(Hazard ratio=46.09, 95% CI 2.41-879.6, p=0.011). In 3 patients (20.0%) of those 15 with aberrant vessel,

hydronephrosis improved after endopyelotomy or re-do pyeloplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic pyeloplasty showed a decreased length of hospital stay and use of pain medication, however, there was no

difference in success rate between the open, laparoscopic and robotic surgery.