Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  357 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 357 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

S29: VIDEO SESSION 2

Moderators: Gregory Dean (USA), Rita Gobet (Switzerland)

ESPU Meeting on Saturday 17, October 2015, 16:49 - 17:30

16:49 - 16:54

S29-1

(VP)

ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC BLADDER AUGMENTATION IN THE

PEDIATRIC PATIENT

Patricia CHO, Ashley WIETSMA, Carlos ESTRADA and Richard YU

Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Urology, Boston, USA

INTRODUCTION

Bladder augmentation is a common surgical intervention for neuropathic bladder dysfunction, and has conventionally

been an open procedure. Technological advancements have allowed minimally invasive approaches to be utilized. The

feasibility and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder augmentation in pediatrics has been reported. We present a

robotic ileocystoplasty to demonstrate the feasibility of an entirely intracorporeal approach in a pediatric patient.

METHODS

The patient was a 6 year old (18.5 kg) boy with a neurogenic bladder secondary to lumbar myelomengiocele. He did not

have a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and had no previous intraabdominal surgery. Despite maximum anticholinergic

therapy and clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) 5 times per day, urodynamic studies revealed a small capacity and

poorly compliant bladder with a maximum detrusor storage pressure >40 cmH

2

O. He was incontinent between

catheterizations. A robotic augmentation cystoplasty was performed.

RESULTS

A three robotic arm setup was used with a fourth assistance laparoscopic port. Total surgical time was 496 minutes.

There were no intraoperative complications and the patient was discharged on post-operative day 8. At one-month

postoperatively, a cystogram revealed no urine leak, and the suprapubic tube was removed. The patient resumed CIC

every 3 hours during the day and once overnight until postoperative urodynamic studies confirmed safe dynamics, after

which the CIC interval could be lengthened.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic bladder augmentation is safe and feasible in a select pediatric population. The entire procedure including

preparation of the bowel segment can be completed intracorporeally even in smaller children. With further experience,

operative times will approach those of open augmentation cystoplasty.