Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  122 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 122 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

11:52 - 11:55

S8-4

(PP)

SUPRANORMAL RENAL FUNCTION IN CHILDREN WITH UPJO- WHAT DOES IT

REALLY MEAN?

Mandy RICKARD

1

, Jennifer D'CRUZ

2

, Armando LORENZO

3

, Carline BOZZATO

1

, Natasha BROWNRIGG

1

, Jorge DEMARIA

1

and Luis BRAGA

1

1) McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery / Urology, Hamilton, CANADA - 2)

McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, Hamilton,

CANADA - 3) The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery / Urology, Toronto, CANADA

PURPOSE

Renograms are routinely performed and indicated in children with high-grade hydronephrosis (HN) to rule out

obstruction. At times, the function of the affected kidney may be greater than the contralateral unaffected side. We

sought to determine if elevated function is indicative of true supranormal renal function (SNRF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our prospectively collected pyeloplasty database (2008-15) was reviewed. A total of 126/135 (93%) patients had a

renogram pre-operatively and 23/126 patients (18%) were found to have SNRF (differential function ≥55%). Baseline

characteristics including pre and post-operative SFU grade and APD were measured. Of 126 patients, 48 (38%) had a

post-operative renogram allowing determination of loss or gain of ≥5% function. After excluding 2 patients with solitary

kidneys, a total of 46 patients were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in both the SNRF and non-SNRF groups including: mean age (months) at surgery

(49±54.2 and 53±60), time to surgery (months) (9.3±11.5 and 8.8±11.8), pre-operative APD (24.6±9mm and

28±10.9mm) and SFU grade (3.4±0.5 and 3.6±0.5). Mean pre-operative function was 62.5 ±13.7% in the SNRF group

and 44.7±8.8% in the non-SNRF group (p<0.01) compared to 56.7 ±14.4% and 43.9 ±13.9% post-operatively

(p<0.01). Table 1 outlines post-operative loss/gain of function in both groups. At last follow-up, HN resolved (SFU ≤2)

in 17(77%) with SNRF and 76(78%) of patients with non-SNRF (p=0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative SNRF does not appear to indicate true elevated function as two-thirds of these patients demonstrated a

decline of ≥5% post-operatively despite similar baseline grades of HN and time to surgery when compared to non-SNRF

patients

Table 1

SNRF

n=11 (%)

Non-SNRF

n=35 (%)

p Value

Decrease ≥5% 7(64)

2(6)

<0.01

Increase ≥5% 1(9)

8(23)

<0.4

No Change

3(27)

25(71)

<0.01