Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  243 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 243 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

16:25 - 16:28

S19-4

(PP)

SFU VERSUS UTD GRADING SYSTEMS FOR PRENATAL HYDRONEPHROSIS: A

TIME TO RESOLUTION ANALYSIS

Luis BRAGA

1

, Melissa MCGRATH

2

, Mandy RICKARD

1

, Kizanee JEGATHEESWARAN

2

, Bethany EASTERBROOK

2

, Jorge

DEMARIA

1

and Armando LORENZO

3

1) McMaster University - McMaster Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery / Urology, Hamilton, CANADA - 2)

McMaster University, Department of Surgery-McMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, Hamilton, CANADA - 3)

The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Surgery / Urology, Toronto, CANADA

PURPOSE

The Urinary Tract Dilation (UTD) grading system for hydronephrosis (HN) was recently released to address potential

shortcomings of the current SFU classification. HN resolution is an important patient outcome and frequently discussed

with families during counselling. We sought to compare these 2 grading systems and their capability to predict the

natural progression of prenatal HN.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

565 patients with prenatal HN (UPJO, megaureter, VUR) have been prospectively screened between 2009-15; with 254

being excluded due to surgical procedures (n=75) and other anomalies (n=179). SFU and UTD HN grades collected at

baseline and last follow-up were compared to identify resolution trends in 311 eligible patients. HN resolution was

defined as APD≤10mm at last follow-up. Time to resolution was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of 311 (80% male) patients, 226 (73%) resolved over a mean follow-up of 25.7±1.05 months. Average HN resolution

rate for SFU I and II was equivalent to that for UTD I (87%). Resolution rate for SFU III was similar to that of UTD II

(62% vs. 65%, p=0.9). HN resolution rate for SFU IV was not significantly different from that of UTD III (38% vs. 45%,

p=0.6) (Table). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with distinctive baseline SFU and UTD grades had significantly

different resolution times for HN (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Resolution rates based on UTD grading system were not significantly different from those according to SFU classification.

This new grading system should not impact how families are counselled regarding the natural progression of prenatal

HN.

Grading System

# of patients with

resolved HN (%)

Total

Time to Resolution

(Months)

SFU I

44(92)

48

17.3±1.5

SFU II

97(82)

119 23.1±1.5

SFU III

78(62)

126 30.8±1.8

SFU IV

7(38)

18

35.7±4.3

UTD I

115(87)

133 19.8±1.1

UTD II

102(65)

158 27.9±1.8

UTD III

9(45)

20

34.2±3.9