Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  286 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 286 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

S22-17

(P)

FETAL MYELOMENINGOCELE REPAIR: THREE YEARS OF ACTIVE UROLOGICAL

FOLLOW UP. CAN WE PREDICT BLADDER FUNCTION?

Antonio Macedo Jr1 MACEDO JR1, Marcela LEAL DA CRUZ, Gustavo MARCONI CAETANO MARTINS,, João PARIZI, Bruno

LESLIE, Riberto Liguori LIGUORI, Gilmar GARRONE and Sérgio LEITE OTTONI

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Pediatric Urology, São Paulo, BRAZIL

PURPOSE

The MOMS study (2011) reported benefits of neurological and orthopedic aspects of patients undergoing fetal

myelomeningocele repair. However, urological aspects were not evaluated in this study. A prospective study of urologic

evaluation was initiated in November 2011 at our institution. The aim of this study is to describe the urological

scenarium of 16 patients who had completed three years old.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since November 2011, 60 patients started urological evaluation and 16 of these had completed three years old. We

performed clinical evaluation, ultrasound of the urinary tract, voiding cystourethrogram and urodynamic study. Patients

were categorized into 4 groups: normal, high risk (overactive bladder with detrusor leak point pressure grater than 40

cmH2O or high filling pressure also greater than 40 cmH2O), incontinent and underactive bladder.

RESULTS

One patient was initially classified as underactive bladder, six patients as incontinent and nine as high risk. By 5 of the

high risk group patients, hydronephrosis or VUR were present, as well as, febrile UTI (one of this without hydroneprhosis

or VUR). Patients classified as incontinent pattern were only kept in surveillance, while those classified with underactive

bladder and righ risk initiated clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) without and with anticolinergic respectively. After

the initial treatment, two patients changed the high risk bladder pattern to normal one and one shifted into incontinent

pattern. Three patients remained at righ risk pattern, but without UTI. One patient underwent vesicostomy and two

patients haven't got the second urodynamic study. One patient presented initially an incontinent pattern but changed

into high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the need of active surveillance by this group, in order to categorize bladder patterns and evaluate

response. As shown in the initial set of exams, bladder pattern remains unpredictable.