Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  305 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 305 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

S25: VIDEO SESSION 1

Moderators: Kirstin Meldrum (USA), Margaret Baka-Ostrowska (Poland)

ESPU Meeting on Saturday 17, October 2015, 12:55 - 13:35

12:55 - 13:00

S25-1

(VP)

THE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL BLADDER EXSTROPHY CONSORTIUM: TECHNICAL

STANDARDIZATION OF COMPLETE PRIMARY REPAIR OF EXSTROPHY IN THE BOY

Joseph G. BORER

1

, Evalynn VASQUEZ

1

, Douglas A. CANNING

2

, John V. KRYGER

3

, Dana WEISS

2

, Travis GROTH

3

, Aseem

SHUKLA

2

, Alexandra BELLOWS

1

and Michael E. MITCHELL

3

1) Boston Children's Hospital, Urology, Boston, USA - 2) Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Urology, Philadelphia, USA -

3) Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Urology, Milwaukee, USA

INTRODUCTION

To increase experience and proficiency in the care of bladder exstrophy (BE), the Multi-Institutional BE Consortium

(MIBEC) was formed in February 2013. Our objective is to describe the technical standardization of complete primary

repair of BE (CPRE) in boys developed through this collaborative effort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three institutions alternately served as hosts with observation, commentary, and critique by the collaborating surgeons

either present in person or via real-time video conferencing. Employing the MIBEC method and protocol, CPRE with

bilateral iliac osteotomy was performed at between 1-3 months of age. Patients were prospectively followed for

outcomes.

RESULTS

From February 2013-February 2015, MIBEC surgeons performed CPRE in 15 consecutive boys at median age of 2.9

months (0.4-28.8 months) for 13 boys with classic BE and 2 with penopubic epispadias. One boy had a midshaft

hypospadiac meatus at CPRE completion. There was no dehiscence. Mild hydronephrosis was present in 2 boys with

dilated distal ureters in 1, pyelonephritis occurred in 1 boy, and 2 boys developed urethrocutaneous fistula. Periods of

dryness with normal urinary stream have been observed in 5 boys. Techniques employed include initial ventral

dissection of urethra using bipolar electrocautery, a deliberate attempt to tailor the bladder neck with proximal urethral

lengthening, and interrupted suture technique for urethral and bladder closure.

CONCLUSIONS

CPRE technique in the boy was standardized through this MIBEC. We noted a low complication rate and are encouraged

by early signs of continence and spontaneous voiding in some. Technical refinement of CPRE and standardization of

postoperative care are ongoing.