Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  91 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 91 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

S4-15

(P)

CAN WE PREDICT THE RISK OF URETERAL REIMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH

DIAGNOSIS OF VESICOURETERAL REFLUX?

Pankaj DANGLE, Audry KANG , Omar AYYASH, Heidi STEPHANY, Glenn CANNON JR., Francis SCHNECK and Michael OST

The Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pediatric Urology, Pittsburgh, USA

PURPOSE

Factors deciding surgical decision making for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) are significantly variable and are based on

individual preferences and practice patterns. With the current shift towards conservative management, it is crucial to

base the surgical decision based on individualized risk factors. Our goal was to assess the individual patient related risk

factors, in patients undergoing corrective VUR surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After IRB approval, a retrospective review of all patients presenting with VUR was performed. Possible independent

predictors evaluated included age, gender, number of febrile UTIs, prenatal diagnosis, bilateral VUR, fever>39.8,

constipation, voiding dysfunction, and radiographic features on VCUG [Dilating (≥ 7mm distal ureter), reflux on filling,

and persistence on post void phase]. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors that predicted

surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 486 eligible patients (average age-25.2 months), 118 (24.3%) had reflux that either remained stable or resolved

while 75.7% required corrective surgery.

Based on multivariate analysis, age, gender, number of febrile UTIs, high grade VUR (<0.001), prenatal diagnosis

(0.003), voiding dysfunction (0.026), and dilation of ureter on VCUG (<0.001) were significant predictors of surgical

intervention.

Female gender (OR 12.2), dilation on VCUG (OR 8.1) and grade 4,5 VUR (OR 5.9) were the strongest predictors. The

logisitic model and prediction equation had good discrimination (c-statistic = 0.87) and very high calibration (p ≥

0.58).

Max VUR

Odds of Surgery

P-value

Grade 1 & 2

N/A

0.017

Grade 3

0.14

<0.001

Grade 4 & 5

5.99

<0.001

CONCLUSIONS

Female gender, high grade VUR, age (post toilet training), number of febrile UTI, prenatal diagnosis, voiding dysfunction

and dilatation of distal ureter are strong preoperative predictive risk factors for corrective surgery for VUR with negative

predictive value of 74%.