Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  263 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 263 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

08:39 - 08:42

S21-5

(PP)

THE EFFICACY OF BIOFEEDBACK THERAPY ON HYDRONEPHROSIS SECONDARY

TO DYSFUNCTIONAL VOIDING IN CHILDREN

Seyedeh-Sanam LADI-SEYEDIAN, Abdol-Mohammad KAJBAFZADEH, Lida SHARIFI-RAD and Erfan AMINI

Tehran University of Medical Science, Pediatric Center of Excellence, Section of Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell

Therapy, Tehran, IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to assess the potential efficacy of biofeedback therapy and home pelvic floor exercises in

children with dysfunctional voiding (DV) associated with mild to moderate hydronephrosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study comprised fifty seven children (35 boys, 22 girls; mean age 8.9±2.6) with mild to moderate

hydronephrosis secondary to DV. All children were regularly visited at our pediatric urology clinic. DTPA, US and

uroflowmetry/EMG were performed in all study participants at baseline. Children with evidence of complete obstruction

in DTPA scan were excluded from enrollment. Children were randomly allocated into two groups including control group

who underwent standard urotherapy (diet, hydration, scheduled voiding) and case group who received biofeedback

therapy in addition to standard urotherapy. A complete 3-day voiding diary was recorded by parents before and after

treatment. Re-evaluation with kidney and bladder ultrasound and uroflowmetry/EMG was also performed 6 months and

one year after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

We noted a more significant decline in APD diameter in case group compared to control group (P<0.05, Table 1). The

mean maximal flow rate prior to treatment was 22.8±6 and 23±7ml/sec in case and control groups, respectively. This

finding decreased significantly one year after the treatment in case group compared to controls (32±7.9 ml/sec vs.

24±12 ml/sec, respectively; P<0.04). Improvement of various parameters in voiding diary was also more significant in

the case group. Right and left APD prior and after biofeedback are as follow:

Right APD Left APD Right APD Left APD

before treatment at follow-up

Case 14.9±6 17.6±6.8 7.1±4.3 8.1±5

Control 13.8±5.2 14.4±4.9 12±3.3 13±4

CONCLUSIONS

Biofeedback therapy should be considered as a potential effective modality in treating hydronephrosis secondary to DV

in children.