Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  445 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 445 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

ICCS S2-5

(P)

ACCURACY OF FLOW INDEXES BETWEEN DIFFERENT VOIDS IN THE SAME

PATIENT.

Israel FRANCO

1

, Jacob FRANCO

2

and Stephen YANG

3

1) New York Medical College, Section of Pediatric Urology, Chappaqua, USA - 2) STonybrook University Medical School,

Urology, Chappaqua, USA - 3) Buddhist Tzu Chi University School of Medicine, Urology, New Taipei, TAIWAN

PURPOSE

Attempts to normalize flows using nomograms or volume corrected flows have been made but with little success. We

recently derived a quadratic formula to estimate Q which is then used to generate a Flow index (FI) based on an

idealized normal voider. We set out to prove its reliability from one void to the next and amongst various bladder

volume and PVR scenarios.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A data set consisting of 1268 children who underwent 2 voids was used to test our sex specific formulas to derive FI

Q

max

. and Q

avg

. Matched pairs of voids based on flow patterns, bladder volume, PVR were tested in various

permutations. Q

max

, Q

avg

FI for each void were compared and tested for accuracy using Root mean square error (√MSE)

and Median Absolute % error (medA%E). Non-parametric testing was done on the different groups to confirm no

difference from the first to the second void.

RESULTS

We found that the most accurate means of evaluating one flow from another was to use FI based off the Total bladder

volume and Idealized voider equation. Q

avg

and Q

max

were less accurate regardless of the type of permutations set up

with medA%E approaching 40% in disparate volume voids and dissimilar voiding patterns. Similar voiding patterns with

similar volumes and PVR were most accurate medA%E =14%, 15% and √MSE=0.23 and 0.27 females and males

respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though non-parametric tests can show that there are no statistical differences between different ways to calculate

flow index and different groups of voiders. The best measure of how accurate a test is and how reproducible is to use

accuracy measures as we have done. We have shown that an idealized normal voider FI is reproducible from one flow

to the next and is a useful tool to follow children over time.