Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  436 / 492 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 436 / 492 Next Page
Page Background

14:36 - 14:40

ICCS S1-8

(SO)

PELVIC-FLOOR THERAPY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT WITH GIGGLE

INCONTINENCE

Maria Luisa CAPITANUCCI

1

, Giuseppina DI SERIO

1

, Francesca MUSCIAGNA

1

, Sabrina ROSSI

1

, Elena BERNARDI

1

,

Giovanni MOSIELLO

1

and Mario DE GENNARO

2

1) Children's Hospital Bambino Gesu', Dep. Urology and Nephrology, Roma, ITALY - 2) Children's Hospital Bambino

Gesu', Dep. Urology and Nephrology, Robotic Surgery and Urodynamics Unit, Roma, ITALY

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy of pelvic-floor therapy (PFT) in children and adolescent with Giggle Incontinence (GI)

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the last 3 years, 15 (5 male and 10 female) patients with GI were observed. Before to start PFT, all patients

underwent bladder diary, flowmetry with EMG of the pelvic floor and ultrasound postvoiding residual urine evaluation

(PVR). PFT consisted in, at least, 3 sessions (1 session/month) ofcognitive and behavioural therapy andphysiotherapyof

pelvic floor muscles by means of exercises to develop ability to isolate, contract and relax perineal muscles. Patients

were instructed to perform daily exercises at home between sessions. Bowel management was added in children with

associated constipation. Results on GI were assessed at the end of PFT. Student t test and Chi square test were applied

for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

Three patients had been previously treated with anthicholinergics without results. Non invasive urodynamic evaluation

showed voiding postponement in 2 males and dysfunctional voiding in 5 females;in none, types of urinary incontinence

different from GI were found. Average age at PFT was 10.6 years in males and 12.1 years in females (p=0.45). Mean

number of PFT sessions was 6 in males and 4.2 in females (p=0.01). Ten (1 male and 8 females, p=0.003) patients

showed improvement of GI after PFT

CONCLUSIONS

PFT is useful to treat GI in children and adolescent. Since PFT seems to be more effective in girls than in boys, it should

be considered before pharmacotherapy especially in female patients